BACK TO PCSTATS Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews
The PCstats Forums

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters


Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB SATA III SSD Review

Intel Core i7 3770K / i5 3570K / i5 3550 Ivy Bridge review - PCSTATS.com Intel Core i7 3770K / i5 3570K / i5 3550 Ivy Bridge review
Fri, May 04 2012 | 1:38PM | Filed under: CPU / Processors| PermaLink Posted by: STAFF

We’ve seen that the new desktop processors are about 10 per cent faster than their predecessors. It's a nice improvement, but it doesn't give you the feeling that Ivy Bridge is significantly faster than Sandy Bridge. The GPU part of the processors, that's where it gets interesting. Not only does Intel support DirectX 11, but the performance of the integrated GPU has been seriously improved. Intel has not quite reached the level of AMD’s A8 chips, but is getting closer. AMD will have to work hard to stay ahead in terms of graphics. Our measurements of their power consumption proved that Ivy Bridge typically is more efficient than Sandy Bridge. It's not a huge difference, but the 10 per cent performance improvement and better energy efficiency means that the performance-per-watt receives a nice boost. In this regard Intel keeps putting more distance between itself and AMD. For the mobile segment the improved performance-per-watt means that laptops and Ultrabooks can become faster and even thinner with Ivy Bridge. For overclockers we were disappointed in the potential for air and water cooled systems, at least with the samples we tested. Sandy Bridge processors are still better for overclocking and remain cooler. But for overclockers with access to extreme cooling methods, then Ivy Bridge reportedly can provide some spectacular results surpassing the 6GHz mark.

 

FULL STORY @ HARDWARE

Recent News in CPU / Processors
Core i7-5960X vs i7-5820K Gaming-Performance Feb 28
AMD Carrizo Performance Mobile APU with Excavator Core Preview Feb 28
GTX 980 SLI vs R9 290X 8GB CF vs R9 295X2 on the AMD FX-9590 at 8K Feb 27
Core i7-5960X CPU Review Feb 26
upcoming Carrizo APU from AMD Feb 24
AMD Radeon R9 290X 8GB vs R9 295X2 at 4K on the AMD FX-9590 CPU Feb 24
Core i7-5930K vs i7-5820K Gaming-Performance Feb 19
Intel reportedly to delay launch of 14nm Skylake desktop CPUs Feb 19
Broadwell-U silicon inside Feb 18
AMD FX vs. Intel Budget Shootout Feb 12
more...

News Categories
Audio / Sound Beginners Guides Benchmarks
Biometrics BIOS Business / Industry
Cases Chipset Computer / SFF PCs
Cooling / Heatsinks CPU / Processors Digital Cameras
Drivers Editorial Games
Gossip Hard Drives Hardware
Home Theatre Imaging Memory
Mobile Devices Monitors Motherboards
Mouse Pads MP3 Players Networking
Notebooks Operating System Optical Drives
Overclocking Peripherals Power Supply
Press Release Printers Servers
Site News Software Tips
Tradeshows / Events Video Cards Web News
   Looking for something a little farther back? Try PCstats News Archives: 1999 - present
   03 / 05 / 2015 | 9:34AM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2015 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.