BACK TO PCSTATS Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews
The PCstats Forums

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters


Seagate Backup Plus Slim External USB 3.0 2TB Hard Drive Review

Biometric Finger Scanners Hacked.... - PCstats.com Biometric Finger Scanners Hacked....
Sat, May 25 2002 | 4:31PM | PermaLink Feedback?
From an article on Biological.ws..... "The data seems to contradict the claims of companies that sell biometric authentication systems. They have said biometrics are among the hardest-to-crack security methods since they rely on the unique physical characteristics of their users. Matsumoto, however, was able to gain unauthorized access with two relatively simple techniques, according to Schneier's report on the tests. Matsumoto performed his experiments on 11 different biometric fingerprint scanners using a fake finger molded out of gelatin. Matsumoto made a plastic mold of a real finger, and then created the false finger by injecting gelatin into the mold. The gelatin finger was able to gain unauthorized access through the 11 fingerprint scanners about 80 percent of the time, according to Schneier. Matsumoto then attempted a more complicated experiment in which he drew latent fingerprints from a piece of glass and attempted to add those prints to the gelatin finger, Schneier wrote. After lifting the fingerprint from the glass, he enhanced it, photographed it and tweaked it in Adobe Systems' Photoshop, he said. Matsumoto then printed the fingerprint onto a transparency sheet and had it etched into a photosensitive circuit board. The print on the circuit board was then applied to the gelatin finger. This technique also allowed access about 80 percent of the time, Schneier wrote. "If he could do this, then any semi-professional can almost certainly do much, much more," Schneier wrote. "All the fingerprint companies have claimed for years that this kind of thing is impossible. When they read Matsumoto's results, they're going to claim that they don't really work, or that they don't apply to them, or that they've fixed the problem," Schneier wrote. "Think twice before believing them."

Full Report is right here: http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/workshop/security/present/s5p4.pdf

FULL STORY @ Archived from BIOLOGICAL
http://www.biological.ws/art.htm
CURRENT Biometrics News on PCSTATS


News Archives by Category
Audio / Sound Beginners Guides Benchmarks
Biometrics BIOS Business / Industry
Cases Chipset Computer / SFF PCs
Cooling / Heatsinks CPU / Processors Digital Cameras
Drivers Editorial Games
Gossip Hard Drives Hardware
Home Theatre Imaging Memory
Mobile Devices Monitors Motherboards
Mouse Pads MP3 Players Networking
Notebooks Operating System Optical Drives
Overclocking Peripherals Power Supply
Press Release Printers Servers
Site News Software Tips
Tradeshows / Events Video Cards Web News
   04 / 18 / 2014 | 6:46AM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2014 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.