PCSTATS Main Page Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews
The PCstats Forums

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

+70 MORE Beginner GUIDES....  

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
Beginners Guide: How To Install / Remove an Intel Socket LGA2011 CPU

Intel Core i7 3820 / X79 Platform - How much Memory is Ideal?

Intel Core i7 3820 / X79 Platform - How much Memory is Ideal? - PCSTATS
Price Check: $/£/€
Abstract: While setting up Gigabyte's latest Intel X79 motherboard on the PCSTATS test bench a few week ago, we found ourselves wondering; "what's the ideal amount of memory to use in a Intel Core i7 3820 'Sandy Bridge-E' platform these days?" Obviously, with a 32-bit Windows 7 OS we'd be limited to 4GB of system memory, but what's the magic number for Windows 7 64-bit?
Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: Intel Apr 10 2012   A. Edmond  
Home > Reviews > CPU / Processors > Intel Core i7 3820

While setting up Gigabyte's latest Intel X79 motherboard on the PCSTATS test bench a few week ago, we found ourselves wondering; "what's the ideal amount of memory to use in a Intel Core i7 3820 'Sandy Bridge-E' platform these days?" Obviously, with a 32-bit Windows 7 OS we'd be limited to 4GB of system memory, but what's the magic number for Windows 7 64-bit?

The mobo in question was a GA-X79-UD5, the one model from Gigabyte's X79 stables capable of supporting 64GB of memory thanks to eight DDR3 RAM slots. At a cost of nearly $600 to populate those eight DIMMs though... we suspect few users will embark on this path until the price of 8GB DDR3 modules comes down some.

As Intel's 'Sandy Bridge-E' processor operates with a quad-channel memory controller, whatever amount of system memory we choose is going to be installed in multiples of four. After scouring the local computer joints and price checking a few online RAM retailers like Crucial, Kingston and Corsair, four options presented themselves; A) 8x 8GB = 64GB DDR3 at a cost of roughly $590, B) 4x 8GB = 32GB DDR3 at ~$280, C) 4x 4GB = 16GB at about $110-$125 and D) 4x 2GB = 8GB for $50 bucks.

Option A) 64GB / $600 is too expensive for this economy, but more importantly we had to ask ourselves if 64GB of system memory would make a justifiable impact in the current motherboard and CPU benchmark sets? Without a clear answer on the application front, one way or the other, spending $600 bucks on RAM is a bad gamble.

Option D) 8GB / $50 is exceptionally economical, however while it's cheap to implement up front, in the long run locking down four DIMM slots to low density 2GB modules means you'll have to replace everything with higher density memory at some point. If your PC budget is super limited, you'd be better off installing 2x 4GB memory modules instead. The cost is the same, the key difference is that 4GB modules are a good density while 2GB DDR3 modules aren't in the long term.


What's better, 16GB of DDR3 or 4GB DDR3?

PCSTATS could have gone with Option B) 32GB / $280 or Option C) 16GB / $110 - either would be a good choice. However, while the former is better in the long term (higher density modules = easier RAM upgrades), the latter was in budget. With that sorted, let's begin. In this brief article PCSTATS will compare an Intel X79 / Core i7 3820 Sandy Bridge-E platform installed with Windows 7 32-bit and 4GB of system memory against the same platform installed with Microsoft Windows 7 x64 running on 16GB DDR3. We want to know how memory capacity and OS choice impact the current motherboard and CPU benchmark sets, in part to determine if the cost of higher density DDR3 modules is justified.


Intel Core i7 3820 Quad-core 'Sandy Bridge-E' Architecture

PCSTATS anticipates the benchmarks will confirm that; 32-bit applications perform the same under a 64-bit operating systems and that 64-bit applications see a nice but modest boost under a native 64-bit OS. How the memory capacity question gets answered with respect to the Sandy Bridge-E CPU architecture and a x64 OS remains to be seen...


Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 motherboard (Intel X79 chipset)

Since the hardware will remain identical between the two tests, we won't bother with a detailed test system spec chart. Each system was comprised of an Intel Core i7 3820 CPU, Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 motherboard, 4x4GB of DDR3-1600-C9 memory, nVidia GTX-470 VGA and 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 SATA II SSD. Explanations after the benchmark chart.

Results in bold are best for each particular benchmark test.

PCSTATS Benchmark Report Windows 7 x64
(16GB RAM)
Windows 7 x32
(4GB RAM)

Intel Core i7 3820

Intel Core i7 3820

- SiSoft Sandra 2012 - Processor
Processor Arithmetic Dhrystone ALU: (GIPS) 126.83 119.76
Processor Arithmetic Whetstone iSSE3: (Gflops) 90.64 93.43
Processor Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE3: (Mpixels/s) 213.2 187.7
Processor Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2: (Mpixels/s) 161.43 126.77
Processor Multi-Media Float x2 iSSE2: (Mpixels/s) 87.55 70.46
- SiSoft Sandra 2012 - Memory
Multicore Efficiency Bandwidth: (GB/s) 29.36 28.2
Multicore Efficiency Latency: (ns) 39.3 41.3
Memory Bandwidth Int iSSE2: (GB/s) 37.56 37.61
Memory Bandwidth Float iSSE2: (GB/s) 37.58 37.6
Memory Latency (Random): (ns) 70.2 72.1
Memory Latency (Linear): (ns) 6.9 7.5
- SYSMark 2007 Preview 1.06
Overall: 316 309
E-Learning: 253 258
Videocreation: 442 407
Productivity: 276 266
3D: 323 326
- Futuremark PCMark Vantage 1.0.0.0
Overall: 17480 17560
Memory: 10982 16846
TV and Movies: 6088 6892
Gaming: 17770 17652
Music: 18553 18760
Communications: 17197 16301
Productivity: 16889 15080
HDD: 17187 26665
- Bibble 5.0
Time to Complete 50 Photo's: (sec) 8.66 8.63
Batch RAW-to-JPEG Conversion: (sec/Image) 0.173 0.173
- ScienceMark 2.3
Primordia: (sec) 2-core 144.75 145.09
Mol Dyn: (sec) 2-core 26.93 26.94
- Cinebench R10
1 CPU (split between cores) 6139 4939
x CPU (full load all cores) 24453 19981
- Cinebench R11.5
1 CPU (split between cores) 7.28 6.78
x CPU (full load all cores) 43.011 54.08
- Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS
1 Million Digits: (sec) 9.984 10
16 Million Digits: (sec) 248.259 248.992
- wPrime 2.0
32 Million Digits (1 thread): (sec) 36.9 36.9
32 Million Digits (2 thread): (sec) 18.6 18.7
32 Million Digits (3 thread): (sec) 12.6 13.0
32 Million Digits (4 thread): (sec) 9.8 10.3
32 Million Digits (5 thread): (sec) 9 9.5
32 Million Digits (6 thread): (sec) 8.2 8.7
32 Million Digits (7 thread): (sec) 7.5 8.0
32 Million Digits (8 thread): (sec) 6.8 7.4
- Pov-Ray 3.7 BETA 30
Render Time (sec) 76.69 73.66
Render Average (Pixels Per Sec) 3418.22 3558.69
- Futuremark 3DMark06 1.1.0
Overall: 25662 25607
CPU: 6991 6965
- Futuremark 3DMark08 Vantage 1.0.1
Performance Overall: (P) 18846 18817
CPU Score: 25121 25084
- Crysis v1.2.1 No AA
800x600 LQ Physics Very High (FPS) ... fail 165.97
1024x768 LQ Physics Very High (FPS) ... fail 165.01
- Sierra FEAR 1.08 No AA
800x600 LQ 831 830
1024x768 LQ 825 826
Number of times out performed other OS: 33 19

Looking over these comparative results a couple points become obvious. First, on the whole the Windows 7 x64 / 16GB system configuration does achieve the majority of better benchmark results. However, among the 'Gaming,' 'CPU-computational and Rendering' oriented benchmarks the two systems return essentially the same results. These tests include Bibble, Sciencemark, SuperPi, WPrime, PovRay, 3DMark06, 3DMark Vantage and FEAR.

Within the group of 'System Level' benchmarks, Sysmark 2007 sees on average a 2% improvement in favour of the Win7 x64/16GB PC configuration. Conversely, PCMark Vantage (another 32-bit application) performs about 11% worse on the Win7 x64/16GB configuration.

The most dramatic difference between Windows 7 x32 / 4GB and Windows 7 x64 / 16GB platforms comes via Cinebench R10 where x32-bit and x64-bit versions of the benchmark compete in their respective native environments. Cinebench R10 x64 posts a healthy 19% gain which just goes to underscore the potential benefit of native x64 software applications running under a x64-bit OS. Curiously, Cinebench R11.5 sees much less of a change between systems. Benchmarks like Sandra's multi-media float x2 and x4 testa witnessed a healthy 21% improvement on the Windows 7 x64 / 16GB platform.

Conclusions

On the whole, Windows 7 x64 is well suited to the Intel Core i7 Sandy Bridge-E architecture. If many of your daily work programs are still 32-bit applications, there's no real penalty to emulating that 32-bit software in a 64-bit OS environment. When native 64-bit applications are run, a nice performance benefit is seen. Furthermore, with the quad-channel high memory capacity available to Sandy Bridge-E processors, a 64-bit Operating System is mandatory.

On the question of how much memory... the results are open to interpretation based on the programs you yourself use. Looking at the results for PCSTATS' standard CPU and Mobo benchmark set, it's clear these applications see little real world performance gain from 16GB of RAM. At a certain point the operating system has enough system memory and then it all comes down to the applications. Spending extra cash on 32GB or 64GB worth of memory isn't necessary, in our case. The caveat of course, is that some programs and games thrive on RAM, so this isn't a one-size-fits-all-statement. Know your applications, know how much memory you need to run Adobe Photoshop, or CAD, or whatever and size your system memory to meet those needs. We may not need 16GB of RAM now, but a year down the road, if the PC requires 32GB of RAM at least the upgrade path is going to be easy.

Not quite the result we expected, but there ya go.

Find out about this and many other reviews by joining the Weekly PCSTATS Newsletter today! Catch all of PCSTATS latest reviews right here.

Related Articles
Here are a few other articles that you might enjoy as well...
- AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer Tested - Windows 8 vs. Windows 7 Performance
- AMD Phenom II X4 975 Black Edition 3.6 GHz Socket AM3 Processor Review
- AMD Athlon II X4 645 3.1GHz Socket AM3 Quad-Core Processor Review
- Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 Intel X79 LGA2011 Motherboard In-Depth Review
- Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD7-B3 Intel P67 Motherboard Review
- Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD5-B3 Intel Z68 Motherboard Review


 

Contents of Article: Intel Core i7 3820

SEARCH PCSTATS 
Use the power of Google to search all of PCSTATS and the PCSTATS Forums. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK?
   10 / 22 / 2014 | 3:59AM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2014 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.