Test System Specs:|
12.5 x 133 MHz = 1.66 GHz
Albatron GeForce4 Ti4600 (300/650)
GeForce4 MX440 (270/400)
ECS AG400 (250/500)
256MB Kingston DDR333
||40 GB Samsung
||NEC 52x CD-ROM|
Panasonic 1.44MB Floppy Drive
||Thermalright SK-6 w/40 CFM YS
||Antec 400W PSU |
||WindowsXP Build 2600|
Quake III Arena Ver 1.17
Return to Castle
3DMark2000 is still a popular benchmarks for
evaluating 3D performance even though it is getting a bit dated. 3DMark2000
continues to provide benchmark results that gauge DirectX7 performance and
hardware transformation and lighting that older games still use. Version 1.1
ensures more reliable functionality with hardware and operating systems that
were released after the launch of 3DMark2000 in December 1999.
Higher numbers denote better
|3DMark 2000 Benchmark Results|
||Albatron GeForce4 MX440
||Albatron GeForce4 Ti4600
see that the ECS AG400 is just a tad behind the GeForce4 MX440 in 3DMark2000.
3DMark2001SE is the latest installment in the
3DMark series by MadOnion. By combining DirectX8 support with completely new
graphics, it continues to provide good overall system benchmarks. 3DMark2001SE
has been created in cooperation with the major 3D accelerator and processor
manufacturers to provide a reliable set of diagnostic tools. The suite
demonstrates 3D gaming performance by using real-world gaming technology to test
a system's true performance abilities. Tests include: DirectX8 Vertex Shaders,
Pixel Shaders and Point Sprites, DOT3 and Environment Mapped Bump Mapping,
support for Full Scene Anti-aliasing and Texture Compression and two game tests
using Ipion real-time physics.
Higher numbers denote better performance.
|3DMark2001SE Benchmark Results |
AG400 scores better then the GeForce4 MX440 in the overall score. Even without
the Nature demo the ECS
AG400 still scores 6609 which is heads and shoulders above the MX440.