PCSTATS Main Page Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

 

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
Seagate Backup Plus Slim External USB 3.0 2TB Hard Drive Review

AMD Athlon64 - 64-bit vs. 32-bit Head On Comparison

AMD Athlon64 - 64-bit vs. 32-bit Head On Comparison - PCSTATS
Abstract: What does 64-bit, specifically the 64-bit support built into AMD's Athlon 64 and AthlonFX processors, have to offer the gamer and enthusiast markets?
Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: AMD Oct 18 2004   Mike Dowler  
Home > Reviews > CPU / Processors > AMD Athlon64

64-bit Extra Registers

Though you would imagine that a similar, if lesser boost would be given to 32-bit executables running on a 64-bit operating system as there would be more memory space to go around, this did not seem to be the case in our tests. A look at the AMD64 white papers confirmed that these registers are available when the processor is running in pure 64-bit mode only.

The future of 64-bit - Microsoft support has yet to arrive

The first half of 2005, to be (in)exact. That's when the boys from Redmond say that 64-bit versions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 will be available. Until then, Windows users will have Microsoft's beta 'x64 Edition' 64-bit port of WinXP for the Athlon 64 and Opteron to play with.

Microsoft had previously released a different, fully 64-bit version of the operating system which was designed to work with Intel's Itanium line of 64-bit processors. Since the Itanium doesn't play nicely with other 64-bit chips, neither unfortunately does this OS.

Despite the valiant arguments of Linux enthusiasts, 64-bit operating systems for the home desktop do not exist until Microsoft says they do. It's inevitable that if and when the 64-bit OS revolution happens, Microsoft products will be driving it.

That said, there's likely to be at least 6 months before we see the official 64-bit version of Windows XP. In this time frame, we'd imagine that the majority of CPUs being sold by AMD will be 64-bit Athlons or Opterons. This could well drive the popularity of 64-bit capable Linux applications through the roof and create a real alternate option for 64-bit systems.... but we doubt it.

This brings us back to waiting six months for the x64 edition of Windows XP. Of course, the beta version has already attracted driver support from Nvidia and ATI, so it may well become a viable platform before the official version is released.

As for the far future, well there is the next version of Windows, the OS currently code-named 'Longhorn' slated to arrive in the first half of 2006. Longhorn will apparently be available in 64-bit flavours from the get-go, so this doesn't give 64-bit XP users much time to adapt to their brand new 64-bit version of XP before a newer (probably better) product drops. It's the Windows ME/Windows 2000 dilemma all over again (except Windows ME is an episode best purged from our collective memories, but we digress.).

Benchmarking the Athlon 64 (again)

The AMD Athlon 64 processor is capable of operating in three distinct modes: Legacy mode (for 32 bit operating systems and apps), Compatibility mode (for 64 bit OS with 32-bit apps) and 64-bit mode (true 64-bit OS/applications). We thought it would be appropriate to test the processor in all three modes with the same set of benchmarks in order to see what the future might have in store for 64-bit adopters. Fortunately there are several benchmarks available and even optimized for the Athlon-64 processor in either 32-bit or 64-bit operation.

As you will see, the majority of the benchmarks on the following pages deal with the various math intensive operations that tax the average processor from day to day, such as compression, de-compression and encryption. Only one of them (the Nvidia one) can be considered even slightly relevant to gaming. This is by design, since we wanted to test the performance of the chip in its various modes, not the video card drivers released for the XP x64 beta. So, let's get started!

< Previous Page © 2017 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: AMD Athlon64
 Pg 1.  AMD Athlon64 - 64-bit vs. 32-bit Head On Comparison
 Pg 2.  AMD64 and 64-bit Operations
 Pg 3.  No Mess Solution for 64-bit
 Pg 4.  AMD's Second Major Innovation
 Pg 5.  — 64-bit Extra Registers
 Pg 6.  64-bit Benchmarks: nvidia, mini-gzip, DivX
 Pg 7.  64-bit Benchmarks: Streams
 Pg 8.  64-bit Benchmarks: RSA Cyrptography
 Pg 9.  From 32-to-64-bit Conclusions

SEARCH PCSTATS 
Use the power of Google to search all of PCSTATS and the PCSTATS Forums. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK?
   12 / 12 / 2017 | 12:55PM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2017 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.