PCSTATS Main Page Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

 

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
Seagate Backup Plus Slim External USB 3.0 2TB Hard Drive Review

AMD Athlon II X4 645 3.1GHz Socket AM3 Quad-Core Processor Review

AMD Athlon II X4 645 3.1GHz Socket AM3 Quad-Core Processor Review - PCSTATS
Abstract: In this review PCSTATS is testing AMD's latest mainstream quad-core chip, the 3.1GHz Athlon II X4 645 processor. Architecturally speaking the Athlon II X4 645 is identical to the preceding Athlon II X4 635 model, except for a modest clock speed increase.
 80% Rating:   
Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: AMD Sep 22 2010   A. Edmond  
Home > Reviews > CPU / Processors > AMD Athlon II X4 645

CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray 3.7

POV-Ray 3.7 Beta 30 Source: POV-RAY

Ray-tracing is a rendering technique that calculates an image of a scene by simulating the way rays of light travel in the real world. In the real world, rays of light are emitted from a light source and illuminate objects. The light reflects off of the objects or passes through transparent objects. This reflected light hits our eyes or perhaps a camera lens. Because the vast majority of rays never hit an observer, it would take forever to trace a scene. Ray-tracing programs like POV-Ray start with their simulated camera and trace rays backwards out into the scene. The user specifies the location of the camera, light sources, and objects as well as the surface texture properties of objects, their interiors (if transparent) and any atmospheric media such as fog, haze, or fire.

Lower render times are better, however higher Pixel Per Second rendering values are best. Pov-ray is multi-threaded.

PCSTATS Benchmark ReportPov-Ray 3.7 BETA 30
Render Time (sec) Points Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 100.06
Intel Core i5 750 100.7
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 192.4
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 66.86
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T 71.25
AMD Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition 90.9
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 93.6
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 121.45
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 195.42
AMD Athlon II X4 645 102.71
AMD Athlon II X4 635 109.5
AMD Athlon II X4 620 121.73
AMD Athlon II X3 435 144.39
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 224.06
Render Average (Pixels Per Sec) Points Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 2619.79
Intel Core i5 750 2603.22
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 1362.53
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3920.73
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T 3679.01
AMD Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition 2884.32
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 2800.68
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 2158.52
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 1341.43
AMD Athlon II X4 645 2552.27
AMD Athlon II X4 635 2394.1
AMD Athlon II X4 620 2153.54
AMD Athlon II X3 435 1815.48
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 1169.96

The quad-core AMD Athlon II X4 645 CPU does generally well for itself in POV-Ray with a render time of 102.71 seconds and average render rate of 2552 pixels per second - close to what an Intel Core i7 system would output in this test. The six-core Phenom II X6 processors top the chart with the best restults in this multi-threaded benchmark. POV-ray has always favored AMD processors.

< Previous Page © 2017 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: AMD Athlon II X4 645
 Pg 1.  AMD Athlon II X4 645 3.1GHz Socket AM3 Quad-Core Processor Review
 Pg 2.  AMD Athlon II X4 645 CPU Overclocking Report
 Pg 3.  CPU System Benchmarks: Sysmark 2007
 Pg 4.  CPU System Benchmarks: PCMark Vantage
 Pg 5.  CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: SiSoft Sandra Processor
 Pg 6.  CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: SiSoft Sandra Memory
 Pg 7.  CPU Calculation Benchmarks: Super Pi
 Pg 8.  CPU Calculation Benchmarks: wPrime2.0
 Pg 9.  CPU Calculation Benchmarks: ScienceMark2.3, WinRAR
 Pg 10.  CPU Rendering Benchmarks: Cinebench R10, Bibble 5
 Pg 11.  — CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray 3.7
 Pg 12.  CPU Rendering Benchmarks: SPECviewPerf 10
 Pg 13.  CPU Synthetic Gaming Benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark 06
 Pg 14.  CPU Gaming Benchmarks: Crysis, FEAR
 Pg 15.  Incremental Clock Boost, Minor Gain?

SEARCH PCSTATS 
Use the power of Google to search all of PCSTATS and the PCSTATS Forums. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK?
   12 / 11 / 2017 | 10:30AM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2017 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.