Test System Specs:
Computer:	AthlonXP1800+ (1.53 GHz at 1.7) 256MB OCZ PC2400 DDR Ram EPoX 8KHA+ MSI StarForce822 (GeForce3 200/460) Promise Ultra100 IDE Controller ATi TV Wonder 10/100 Realtek NIC AOpen 56k Modem SB Live! Platinum 5.1 30GB IBM DeskStar 75 GXP 2x 30GB Seagate Barracuda III 20GB Quantum Fireball AS 12x Toshiba DVD-Rom 16x10x40 Yamaha CD-RW Plus seven (7) case fans... Enermax 430W PSU
Software:	Windows 98SE Via 4in1 4.35V DetonatorXP 22.80 All the rest of the devices had their respectable latest drivers
Benchmarks:	SiSoft Sandra 001 Content Creation Winbench 99 3DMark2000 Ver 1.1 3DMark2001 Vulpine's GLMark Quake III Arena Ver 1.17 Return to Castle Wolfenstein

Hey, I know what you're thinking, how come so many devices/fans? Remember, I said this board was going to replace my Iwill KK266-R so might as well use everything! Oh, by the way all those fans combined are not as loud as (1) 60mm Delta fan by itself!

Sisoft Sandra: CPU Benchmark
Motherboard:	Setting:	ALU:	FPU:
Epox 8KHA+	12.5x133	4604 MIPS	2315 MFLOPS
Epox 8KHA+	10x170	4711 MIPS	2369 MFLOPS

Sandra is a good tester of pure power. As we can see, they all perform within a few hundred points of each other. The Sandra memory benchmark used to be one of my favorites, however now it's become quite ridiculous. It's common knowledge that the i850/RDRam combo has the most memory bandwidth. There's no way a DDR system can match it! I liked the older memory tester in 2001 TE, as it measured more realistic bandwidth.

Content Creation Winstone 2001
Setting:	Content Creation Winstone
12.5x133	66.7 Winstone Units
10x170	70.2 Winstone Units

There isn't much of a noticeable difference between the two systems according to Content Creation. More of a CPU test and since the speeds are so close together, it's no surprise the performance is very similar.

ZDNet's Winbench99

WinMark 99
Setting:	Business Disk	High-end Disk:	Business Graphics:	High-end Graphics:
12.5x133	10200	19000	777	2300
10x170	10400	19300	811	2410

The little difference in the CPU speed makes up the difference in this benchmark. It's not something a person could really notice though. Let's take a look at some 3D benchmarks now!

MadOnion 3DMark 2000 Ver 1.1
Setting:	3D Marks
12.5x133	10982
10x170	11493

3DMark2000 notices a minor difference between the two systems. A difference of 500 points really isn't much anymore all things considered.

3DMark2001

MadOnion 3DMark 2001
Setting:	3D Marks
12.5x133	7659
10x170	8177

3DMark2001 is well known for loving high bus speeds, this time, it clearly favors the system with a 170 MHz FSB! 3DMark2001 is a pretty good DirectX8 benchmark.

Hmm... it looks like GLMark is more of a video card benchmark as it can barely differentiate between the two systems. Okay, I'm pretty tired of the synthetics right now. Let's take a look at some real world game engines :-)