PCSTATS Main Page Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

 

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
Seagate Backup Plus Slim External USB 3.0 2TB Hard Drive Review

FireWire vs. USB; Apple and Intel Play Hardball

FireWire vs. USB; Apple and Intel Play Hardball - PCSTATS
Abstract: Something happened a few years ago that suppressed the widespread support for FireWire in favor of the much lesser USB...
Filed under: Peripherals Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: Various May 20 2002   D. S. Jones  
Home > Reviews > Peripherals > Various

So what happened?

Three things. First, Apple, who owns the patents for FireWire, killed its Golden Goose by demanding a license fee of several dollars for each PC, which Intel and most computer makers found to be economically untenable. This opened the door for USB. Intel gave the USB technology to their OEM partners royalty-free (as they do today), and IEEE 1394-FireWire-was quietly dropped from the PC 98 specification. Apple backed off their high-priced position, down to today's 25ยข-per-PC license fee, but the damage was done.

Secondly, there were solid technical reasons why Intel passed on FireWire in favor of USB. The original IEEE 1394 100Mb/s-200Mb/s implementations were power-hungry chips that required 5V chips - okay for desktop PC's, but not for the newer 3.3V laptops.

Plans for using Firewire to replace the IDE subsystem in laptops fizzled. The goal of FireWire becoming the universal standard in desktop PCs soured for another reason: Intel found that the 5V requirement would cause FireWire chips to be actually more expensive to produce as chip die sizes got smaller. The future higher-speed FireWire standard (800Mb/s to 1600Mb/s peer-to-peer, computer-independent connections) will be a lower-power, lower-voltage implementation - but again, the damage was done.

The situation could have been reversed, but the first FireWire chips produced by Adaptec and Texas Instruments were erratic performers. In contrast, USB 1.1 seemed to suffer none of these ills. Its only grievous sin was lack of speed.

USB 2.0 changes this dramatically, with a performance boost seemingly designed to match and slightly edge-out FireWire: 1.5-12-480Mb/s throughput, with up to 127 devices supported at once with cable lengths up to 5 meters, supplying power to all devices up to 500 mA/5V, with full backwards compatibility with all USB 1.1 devices.

< Previous Page © 2017 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: Various
 Pg 1.  FireWire vs. USB; Apple and Intel Play Hardball
 Pg 2.  — So what happened?
 Pg 3.  USB's Planned Dependence

SEARCH PCSTATS 
Use the power of Google to search all of PCSTATS and the PCSTATS Forums. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK?
   12 / 14 / 2017 | 8:26AM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2017 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.