PCSTATS Main Page Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

 

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
Seagate Backup Plus Slim External USB 3.0 2TB Hard Drive Review

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2GHz Socket AM3 6-Core Processor Review

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2GHz Socket AM3 6-Core Processor Review - PCSTATS
Abstract: The first ever six-core socket AM3 processor from AMD has arrived to directly compete against Intel's robust Core i7 9-series 'Nehalem' chips. Code named 'Thuban', the new 3.2GHz AMD Phenom II X6 1090T processor introduces with it a dynamic overclocking technology called TurboCore.
 95% Rating:   
Filed under: CPU / Processors Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: AMD May 01 2010   Julian Apong  
Home > Reviews > CPU / Processors > AMD Phenom II X6 1090T

CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray 3.7, SPECviewPerf 10

POV-Ray 3.7 Beta 30 Source: POV-RAY

Ray-tracing is a rendering technique that calculates an image of a scene by simulating the way rays of light travel in the real world. In the real world, rays of light are emitted from a light source and illuminate objects. The light reflects off of the objects or passes through transparent objects. This reflected light hits our eyes or perhaps a camera lens. Because the vast majority of rays never hit an observer, it would take forever to trace a scene. Ray-tracing programs like POV-Ray start with their simulated camera and trace rays backwards out into the scene. The user specifies the location of the camera, light sources, and objects as well as the surface texture properties of objects, their interiors (if transparent) and any atmospheric media such as fog, haze, or fire.

Lower render times are better, however higher Pixel Per Second rendering values are best. Pov-ray is multi-threaded.

PCSTATS Benchmark ReportPov-Ray 3.7 BETA 30
Render Time sec Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 100.06
Intel Core i5 750 100.7
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 192.4
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 66.86
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (TurboCore OFF) 67.39
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (125W) 93.6
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 121.45
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 195.42
AMD Athlon II X4 635 109.5
AMD Athlon II X4 620 121.73
AMD Athlon II X3 435 144.39
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 224.06
Render Average Pixels Per Sec Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 2619.79
Intel Core i5 750 2603.22
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 1362.53
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3920.73
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (TurboCore OFF) 3889.84
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (125W) 2800.68
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 2158.52
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 1341.43
AMD Athlon II X4 635 2394.1
AMD Athlon II X4 620 2153.54
AMD Athlon II X3 435 1815.48
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 1169.96

Here's another multi-threaded test, and again the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T's six cores give it a big lead over the Intel Core i7 920 processor, even when the latter has HyperThreading enabled. 3D ray-tracing is a definite forte for this processor.

SPECviewPerf 10 Source: POV-RAY

The SPECgpc project group develops and distributes SPECviewperf, which measures the 3D rendering performance of systems running under OpenGL. SPECviewperf measures the 3D rendering performance of systems running under OpenGL. The SPECopcSM project group has worked with independent software vendors (ISVs) to obtain tests, data sets and weights that constitute what is called a viewset. Each viewset represents the graphics rendering portion of an actual application. The ISVs that develop SPECopc viewsets have provided percentage weights for each test for which a performance number is reported. ISVs have defined these percentages to indicate the relative importance of a test within the overall application.

Higher results are better.

PCSTATS Benchmark ReportSPECviewPerf 10
2core Catia Points Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 16.33
Intel Core i5 750 17.91
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 14.01
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 17.4
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (TurboCore OFF) 18.81
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (125W) 17.09
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 14.44
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 12.31
AMD Athlon II X4 635 16.54
AMD Athlon II X4 620 17.19
AMD Athlon II X3 435 14.2
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 11.12
2core Maya Points Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 40.51
Intel Core i5 750 37.41
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 32.63
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 36.67
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (TurboCore OFF) 33.45
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (125W) 33.73
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 29.23
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 31.83
AMD Athlon II X4 635 28.51
AMD Athlon II X4 620 29.73
AMD Athlon II X3 435 32.07
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 29.26
2core PROe Points Ranking
Intel Core i7 920 14.38
Intel Core i5 750 13.91
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 10.28
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 12.29
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (TurboCore OFF) 12.12
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (125W) 11.19
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 10.98
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 8.32
AMD Athlon II X4 635 9.83
AMD Athlon II X4 620 9.66
AMD Athlon II X3 435 9.75
AMD Athlon II X2 240e 10.02

SPECviewPerf shows the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T as being about the same speed as the Intel Core i5 750 processor.

< Previous Page © 2017 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
 Pg 1.  AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2GHz Socket AM3 6-Core Processor Review
 Pg 2.  TurboCore - AMD gets dynamic frequency adjustment
 Pg 3.  TurboCore Impact on System Power Draw
 Pg 4.  Six-Core Overclocking - Breaking New Records
 Pg 5.  CPU System Benchmarks: Sysmark 2007
 Pg 6.  CPU System Benchmarks: PCMark Vantage
 Pg 7.  CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: SiSoft Sandra Processor
 Pg 8.  CPU Synthetic Benchmarks: SiSoft Sandra Memory
 Pg 9.  CPU Calculation Benchmarks: Super Pi
 Pg 10.  CPU Calculation Benchmarks: wPrime2.0
 Pg 11.  CPU Calculation Benchmarks: ScienceMark2.3, WinRAR
 Pg 12.  CPU Rendering Benchmarks: Cinebench R10, Bibble 5
 Pg 13.  — CPU Rendering Benchmarks: POV-Ray 3.7, SPECviewPerf 10
 Pg 14.  CPU Synthetic Gaming Benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark 06
 Pg 15.  CPU Gaming Benchmarks: Crysis
 Pg 16.  CPU Gaming Benchmarks: FEAR
 Pg 17.  TurboCore for single-threads, Six cores for multi-threads

SEARCH PCSTATS 
Use the power of Google to search all of PCSTATS and the PCSTATS Forums. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK?
   12 / 17 / 2017 | 6:36PM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2017 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.