PCSTATS Main Page Follow PCSTATS on Facebook PCSTATS RSS Feed PCSTATS Twitter Feed + Motherboards
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

 

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
Seagate Backup Plus Slim External USB 3.0 2TB Hard Drive Review

Adaptec AAA-UDMA RAID Controller

Adaptec AAA-UDMA RAID Controller - PCSTATS
Abstract: The controller is the AAA-UDMA, a four-channel UDMA/66 RAID controller supporting up to four hard drives in RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 0/1, and RAID 5 configurations.
Filed under: Servers Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: Adaptec Mar 30 2001   D. Dee  
Home > Reviews > Servers > Adaptec AAA-UDMA

A little about RAID

For those unfamiliar with RAID, here's an explanation of the relevant RAID levels. RAID stands for Redundant Array of Independent Disks, or Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks in you want the old-school meaning. RAID has been around for a while but has until recently been restricted to servers and high-end workstations using SCSI drives, since EIDE drives were slower, less reliable, and did not come in sufficiently large capacities.

But now, times have changed, and ATA drives have almost caught up to SCSI in terms of performance (at similar areal densities and rotational speeds) and reliability, and have even passed them in terms of capacity. And, of course, ATA drives are much cheaper, and that's what makes this controller appealing: using it with a few big ATA drives, you can create a RAID array with an enormous capacity for a fairly low cost. But what exactly is a RAID array? Well, there are a number of different types, but here are explanations of the four most common found in most RAID systems and, not coincidentally, supported by this controller.

First is RAID 0, which, strictly speaking, isn't actually RAID at all because it's not redundant. RAID 0 stripes data across multiple drives. When the array is created, a cluster size for each piece of data is set. This is usually 64 or 128K, but can be higher or lower, depending on what the RAID hardware supports. Quite simply, the first cluster is placed on the first disk in the array, the next on the second disk, the next on the third, and so on.

This should be the fastest type of array, since all drives are retrieving or writing data simultaneously, and should, in theory, be as many times as fast as a single drive as there are drives in the array. Of course, with computers, theory rarely approaches reality, but still RAID 0 should be pretty fast. The drawback to using RAID 0 is that it has no redundancy, and if any of the drives in the array fail, all of the data on the array is lost. True RAID 0 requires at least two drives, although most RAID controllers, including the AAA-UDMA, can treat a single drive as a RAID 0 array.

RAID 1 always uses two drives, as it mirrors the data from one drive onto the second. That way if one drive fails, the second is still there and the system can keep going. RAID 1 should be a little faster when reading than a single drive, but it's also a little slower when writing since the drives have to synchronize their write heads to record data. The other obvious drawback to RAID 1 is that it only uses 50% of the full capacity of both drives for data storage, since the other half is used as a mirror. RAID 1 is best for systems that don't require a lot of throughput but need to be able to run well if a drive fails.

> RAID 0/1, sometimes called RAID 10 or RAID 0+1, is accomplished by a fusion of RAID levels 0 and 1. It uses mirrored stripe sets, and therefore provides the high performance of striping while keeping the redundancy of mirroring. With four drives, the first two drives make up one stripe set, and the second two mirror the first two. As with RAID 1, this only uses half the actual drive capacity, but it's significantly faster than RAID 1. With four drives, the array might withstand the loss of up to two drives, depending on which two fail, but at worst it can sustain the loss of one drive and still keep functioning. RAID 0/1 requires at least four drives, which is of course the maximum numbers supported by the AAA-UDMA.

RAID 5 is very popular as it provides high speed as well as redundancy. It is similar to RAID 0 in that it stripes data across multiple drives, but in addition to data it also stores parity information about that data. If a drive in the array fails, that parity can be used to reconstruct the lost data and keep the system running, though at a substantially slower rate. Still, once the failed drive is replaced, the array can be reconstructed. RAID 5 uses an amount of parity space equal to the capacity of one of its drives, so with three drives, a third of the space is devoted to parity.

The parity is spread evenly across the drives, so it doesn't matter which drive fails since parity for the missing data exists on the other drives. RAID 5 should be almost as fast as RAID 0, but of course the space used for parity and the calculations required to create it slow it down somewhat. Still, RAID 5 uses most of the capacity of the drives in the array for actual data storage, and is very often used in servers. As you can see from the description, RAID 5 requires at least three drives.

There are a number of other RAID levels: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 53. If you want descriptions of them, as well as graphical representations of how data is arranged on these arrays, have a look at AC&NC's excellent RAID guide.

< Previous Page © 2017 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: Adaptec AAA-UDMA
 Pg 1.  Adaptec AAA-UDMA RAID Controller
 Pg 2.  — A little about RAID
 Pg 3.  Initialization time for the array
 Pg 4.  The full specs
 Pg 5.  Three Drives improve performance
 Pg 6.  RAID 0 Performance
 Pg 7.  RAID 1 Performance
 Pg 8.  OS Supported
 Pg 9.  Software management
 Pg 10.  CI/O software
 Pg 11.  RAID 5 benchmarks
 Pg 12.  processor usage
 Pg 13.  Conclusions

SEARCH PCSTATS 
Use the power of Google to search all of PCSTATS and the PCSTATS Forums. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK?
   12 / 12 / 2017 | 10:41PM
Hardware Sections 


google
 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
TransmetaZone
BeginnersPC
PCSTATS Newsletter
PCSTATS Forums
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Employment
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2017 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.