Unreal Tournament 2003	Source: Epic

Unreal Tournament 2003 is the sequel to 1999's multiple 'Game of the Year' award winner. Unreal Tournament 2003 employs the use of Vertex as well as Pixel Shaders and it's recommended that you use a DirectX 8 videocard to get the most out of the game.

UT2003 - 640x480
Flyby	FPS	Ranking
Asus A8V (K8T800 Pro, 200/400)	328.25
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro, 200/400)	325.21
Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 (NF3 Ultra, 200/400)	326.5
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 200/400)	329.17
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 236/392)	317.2
Botmatch	FPS	Ranking
Asus A8V (K8T800 Pro, 200/400)	106.45
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro, 200/400)	105.21
Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 (NF3 Ultra, 200/400)	105.61
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 200/400)	106.34
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 236/392)	101.94

It should be fairly obvious that UT2003 runs well on an AMD Athlon64 system. Performance is excellent!

Unreal Tournament 2004	Source: Epic

Unreal Tournament 2004 is the sequel to the highly popular UT2003 and uses the very latest Unreal Engine technology. Unreal Tournament 2004 employs the use of Vertex and Pixel Shaders and it's recommended that you use a DirectX 9 videocard to you plan to play competitively.

UT2004 - 640x480
dm-rankin	FPS	Ranking
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 200/400)	106
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 236/392)	104.23
as-convoy	FPS
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 200/400)	68.04
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra, 236/392)	66.92

UT2004 is new to us, but those framerates are quite high when compared to some Intel Pentium4 systems we've recently tested. The same trend is present here; overclocked systems are actually performing slightly slower than when at stock speeds.