SiSoft Sandra 
      2005 | 
    Source: Sandra | 
  
     | 
Sandra is 
designed to test the theoretical power of a complete system and individual 
components. The numbers taken though are again, purely theoretical and may not 
represent real world performance. 
  
  
    | 
       Sisoft Sandra 2005 
      Benchmark Results  | 
  
     | 
    Multimedia Benchmark | 
    CPU Benchmark | 
    Memory Benchmark | 
    File System Benchmark | 
  
    | Processors | 
    Integer SSE2: | 
    Floating-Point 
    SSE2: | 
    Dhrystone SSE2:  | 
    Whetstone SSE2: | 
    Integer SSE2:  | 
    Float SSE2: | 
    Drive Index: | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    46034 | 
    49669 | 
    22352 | 
    7634 FPU / 9878 SSE2 | 
    4718 | 
    4727 | 
    93 | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/64 Bit Software 
     | 
    35958 | 
    55555 | 
    23824 | 
    8581 FPU / 10015 SSE2 | 
    4698 | 
    4712 | 
    90 | 
  
    | 
       Units:  | 
    it/s | 
    it/s | 
    MIPS | 
    MFLOPS | 
    MB/s | 
    MB/s | 
    MB/s | 
SiSoft Sandra numbers from the dual core Canada 
Computers Content Creator X2 system is very impressive indeed. The processor 
numbers are double what we usually see from the Athlon64 4000+ which is already 
a very powerful processor. Memory bandwidth is a bit lower than we expected 
however, most regular Athlon64/NF4 setups are around 6000MB/s. The HDD File 
system benchmark is also quite impressive, a 10,000 RPM WD Raptor scores around 
55-60MB, here the two WD 250GB Serial ATA II HDDs get around 90MB/s!
PCMark04 
is an application-based benchmark and a premium tool for measuring overall PC 
performance. It uses portions of real applications instead of including very 
large applications or using specifically created code. This allows PCMark04 to 
be a smaller installation as well as to report very accurate results. 
  
  
    | PCMark04: | 
  
    | Overall | 
    Points | 
    Ranking | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    6615 | 
        | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    6600 | 
        | 
  
    | CPU | 
    Points | 
    Ranking | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    6618 | 
        | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    6667 | 
        | 
  
    | Memory | 
    Points | 
    Ranking | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    4674 | 
        | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    4668 | 
        | 
PCMark04 does not care whether WindowsXP 32-bit or 
WindowsXP Professional x64 Edition is used as the scores are within the margin 
of error on both platforms. Still, the numbers are pretty good and the CPU score 
is about 50% higher than we'd see on a regular Athlon64 4000+ processor. Memory 
bandwidth is still on the low side however.
PCMark05 
is a premium tool for measuring both normal home use and simple 3D performance 
of the latest PC hardware. There are 11 system tests - each one is designed to 
represent a certain type of PC usage. By running these tests, PCMark05 stresses 
the components in a similar manner as they are stressed in normal home usage. 
  
  
    | PCMark05: | 
  
    | Overall | 
    Points | 
    Ranking | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    3853 | 
        | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    2167 | 
        | 
  
    | CPU | 
    Points | 
    Ranking | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    4842 | 
        | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    4834 | 
        | 
  
    | Memory | 
    Points | 
    Ranking | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 32 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    3943 | 
        | 
  
    | CC Content Creator X2 64 Bit OS/32 Bit 
Software | 
    3781 | 
        | 
PCMark05 
numbers are pretty good especially when compared to systems on FutureMark's Online Result Browser. It seems however 
the benchmark has a problem running in a 64 bit environment, something I'm sure 
FutureMark is aware of.