SysMark 2004 |
Internet Overall: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
202 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
228 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
222 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
225 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
224 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
230 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
220 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
220 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
218 |
|
3D Creation: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
202 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
219 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
220 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
219 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
211 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
215 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
214 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
210 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
212 |
|
2D Creation: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
246 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
273 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
244 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
268 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
269 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
276 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
265 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
268 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
264 |
|
Web Publication |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
167 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
198 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
205 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
195 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
197 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
205 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
188 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
188 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
187 |
|
Office Overall: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
201 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
211 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
212 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
201 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
204 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
208 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
181 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
182 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
207 |
|
Communication: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
210 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
218 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
218 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
206 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
208 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
217 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
155 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
149 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
212 |
|
Document Creation: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
217 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
223 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
226 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
217 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
216 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
221 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
208 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
206 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
223 |
|
Data Analysis: |
Points |
Ranking |
ASRock K8 Combo-Z/ASR (Ali M1689 200/400) |
177 |
|
Soltek SL-K8TPro-939 (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
193 |
|
MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (K8T800 Pro 200/400) |
194 |
|
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
182 |
|
Epox 9NDA3+ (NF3 Ultra 200/400) |
183 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 (NF4 Ultra 200/400) |
189 |
|
Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
184 |
|
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (NF4 SLI 200/400) |
196 |
|
Albatron K8X890 Pro II (K8T890 200/400) |
188 |
|
We're happy to see that the Albatron K8X890 Pro II
performs well in SYSmark2004. It's not the fastest but neither is it the slowest
of the motherboards tested. Interestingly the K8T890 chipset seems a little
slower than its predecessor in this benchmark, but not enough to make even the
slightest difference to actual applications.