PCSTATS     
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Motherboards by Brand
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

VIA Apollo 133A Mainboard Shootout
VIA Apollo 133A Mainboard Shootout - PCSTATS
This is not going to be pretty folks, so I'll take this moment to recommend that anyone easily disgusted by low performance, or has a weak stomach to leave this article immediately.
 83% Rating:   
Filed under: Motherboards Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: Various Feb 28 2001   D. Dee  
Home > Reviews > Motherboards > Various Apollo 133A

memory benchmarks

Now most will say the synthetic memory benchmarks are mildly inconclusive and are just that, synthetic. But in this case they are a good measure between bandwidth perceived on each subsystem and how it relates to the end users "feel" of a system.
 
There are arguments on both sides of this, and I am not getting into that for now, just enough to say that regardless of what some may see as valid readings of actual real world performance, these are interesting enough in that there are viable and noticeable differences in each boards implementation of the chipset and it's abilities to transfer information along the memory, chipset, and CPU subsystem. Also added into the mix is a real world performance type benchmark of Winstone 99, with it's abusive tests of the 3 most popular suites of business software, the systems ability to handle multiple tasks at blazing speed, and how it relates to the user and what they will be able to do at any given moment.
 
Not to be left out is a dose of Quake 3 Arena scores at the max of 32 bit colors and textures, with a resolution of 1024x768. Any other scores would have been redundant, and also this is not a review of a video card. I used those settings to show that being the video card is mostly taxed at this high of a viewing state, and relies more heavily on the subsystem to achieve higher frame rates it becomes a good comparison of the implementation of the chipset, the new AGP 4x option, and how well the motherboard can handle intense gaming graphics of this nature where the subsystem must pick up where the video card left off.

Test System Configuration

Processor(s) Intel Pentium III 550E Slot-1
Memory 64 Megs PC-133 SDRAM
Hard Drive Quantum Fireball 3.2 Gig
Video Card Elsa Erazor X2 GeForce DDR
Operating System Windows 98 SE


Take a close look at these numbers folks. I ran all tests 3 times, averaged the scores and came up with what is shown. I also showed scores with everything running at spec'd speeds, as well as the highest stable attainable speeds on each. My definition of stable is the systems ability to run all benchmark suites with absolutely no errors or hangs completely through 3 times. As you can see, the Tyan falls short in all areas, and wouldn't OC substantially enough for a real performance gain. AOpen took the show with it's excellent ability to run at the higher bus speeds, showing the attention they put into the design and implementation of Via's new chipset.
 
While it is still in it's infancy (IMHO), and doesn't quite get the numbers of our old standby the BX, it is still by far the better of the two tested Via boards and offers the hobbyist a largely more enjoyable experience.

< Previous Page © 2023 PCSTATS.com Next Page >

 

Contents of Article: Various Apollo 133A
 Pg 1.  VIA Apollo 133A Mainboard Shootout
 Pg 2.  Tyan Trinity 400
 Pg 3.  AOpen AX64 Pro
 Pg 4.  — memory benchmarks
 Pg 5.  Conclusions

 
Hardware Sections 


 
PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
FrostyTech
PCSTATS Newsletter
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
News Archives
(Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?
© Copyright 1999-2023 www.pcstats.com All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use.